Science proves women who wax have better sex

By | September 23, 2011

Just in case the nerds reading Discover ever encounter a naked woman:

no maintenance required for hygienic and attractive genitals with Laser Hair Removal

no maintenance required for hygienic and attractive genitals with Laser Hair Removal

Yes nerds there are a few women out there that look like Sasquatch in silk.  Most of those MILF’s are really mothers with infinitely long fur, and as they get older that hair gets less like fur and more like steel wool.  It typically intertwines to the point that a machete, or some advanced talent in untying knots, is needed just to get to something that may be moist.

If the pubes are long enough (almost always) they will get pulled in to the love canal adding to the friction right up until the abrasion starts removing the mans skin.  This is one time that premature ejaculation is desired.

Some of the furry women that insist on being Sasquatch in the crotch argue that men only want them to look like a twelve-year-old.

Yet they shave their arm pits to look like a twelve-year-old,

they put on makeup designed to make their faces look like a pubescent girl and….

they also shave their legs to look like a per-pubescent girl.

Yes there are a few aging women that want to be lazy and long for the long hair down there such as Lisa G. but while she equates Sasquatch crotch with having  a “reclaimed sense of womanhood” I did not read in her prose that she wants to have her armpit hair, leg hair and dark circles under her eyes back to help her in her quest to reclaim womanhood.  Typical.

The frustration for men that prefer less jungle to deal with is you need to get to that point in a relationship just to find out that she is that disinterested in making the intimate part of the relationship good for you only in making her parts exposed in clothes attractive enough to lure you in.

A PDF of the scientific study with all the proper charts and graphs can be had from here Pubic Hair Removal among Women in the United States: and makes for very interesting reading.

As reported in the New York Times recently

Laser hair removal in general is a growing trend. Last year about 1.4 million Americans had it done, a 53 percent increase over 2003, according to the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. The society does not track the number of procedures done on specific body parts, but anecdotal evidence suggests that more young women are going bare under their briefs.

Now there are at home devices that mimic the laser hair removal method used in the doctors office at a fraction of the price.  There is Lumi by evoDerma and Tria the first one on the market.  They are not as powerful as the in office machines and will require more treatments but what the hell you can do it at home!

Dermatologists and aestheticians report that laser removal of pubic hair is one of their most popular procedures. And gynecologists, emergency room physicians and other medical practitioners in big cities say they also have noticed a surge in patients who have had it done. From this NYT

“I do full body exams to check for skin cancer, and I can think of almost no female patients who come in with natural pubic hair,” said Karyn Grossman, a dermatologist in Santa Monica, Calif., and New York City. “Either they have nothing left, or they have a small patch that is two inches by half an inch, but the trend is toward having it all gone.”

Latricia Stone, 35, a medical devices representative in Orlando, Fla., spent $1,500 on pubic hair removal at an Ideal Image laser center. Convenience was one reason, she said. Another was her desire to spice up her marriage.

“When I met my husband during college, I had just modeled for a bikini photo shoot and I had no hair down there,” Ms. Stone said. “But 12 years later, with two kids and a busy job, my pubic hair was like wool. I had no time for bikini wax appointments.” Now, she said, “my husband is very happy.”

Fifty percent of our female patients ask to go totally hairless, but 10 percent of our male patients come in for the same treatment,” said Mitchel P. Goldman, the dermatologist who founded La Jolla Spa MD, “especially the mountain bikers who don’t want pubic hair getting in the way of sports.” These men, Dr. Goldman said, opt for total hair removal. “This includes the hair around the scrotum, the testicles and the peri-anal area,” he said.

Some doctors speculate that lasers are fueling the completely bare trend because they do not cause cuts, razor bumps, rashes or ingrown hairs, which can result from shaving and waxing. Lasers work by blasting hair follicles with heat, which causes hair to fall out and reduces new growth. Unlike waxing, shaving and depilatories, a series of laser treatments can permanently reduce hair by 80 to 90 percent.

The technique can be expensive. Doctors charge from $250 to $750 for each treatment of the pubic area. Three to 12 sessions may be needed for permanent hair reduction, plus follow-up treatments once or twice a year.

Doctors say pubic hair serves a biological purpose. It acts as a barrier to bacteria and viruses, reduces friction during sex and disseminates pheromones, the scents that scientists think may trigger sexual attraction in people.

“But my patients don’t care that sex might become less sexy because denuding themselves reduces pheromones,” said Ava Shamban, a dermatologist in Santa Monica.

(And interestingly in the same article in NYT are doctors now commenting on the usefulness of pheromones being distributed in the air by the pubic hair.  I guess these folks should have a meeting with those that claim that there are no such thing as Human pheromones.)

Shanacy Kashani, 27, an airline scheduler who is one of Dr. Shamban’s patients, said that she and her boyfriend are enjoying sex more now that she’s had the treatment, which was a gift from her boyfriend. Nevertheless Ms. Kashani said that removing her pubic hair was less about sex than it was a personal statement that she compares to a tattoo.

“Once when I was at a pool party with friends, we all dyed our pubic hair pink,” Ms. Kashani said. “But now I’ve decided to have almost all of it off.”

Now here comes the femi-nazi, religious, bullshit that is always used by the naysayers from the same NYT article:

Mary Lupo, a dermatologist in New Orleans, refuses to laser the inner labia and anal regions, but not because of health concerns. “We will laser the front and the backside,” Dr. Lupo said, “but we don’t spread any skin or do between the cheeks because there is an indelicacy to that which is embarrassing to both the practitioner and the patient.” She discourages her patients from going completely bare. “Grown women without pubic hair look weird,” she said. “And men liking women to have no pubic hair could have a pedophilia aspect to it.”

So we must derive that the OBGYN and proctologist, and urologist are embarrassed all day long. Additionally we must assume that all men that like shaved underarms, or shaved legs or eye makeup on women are pedophiles as well.  Of course that only applies to MEN as women (lesbians) that prefer their partners be smooth or women that prefer that their heterosexual partner be smooth could not possible be a pedophile.

One subject almost never seen when discussing pubic hair removal is now those unsightly GREY PUBIC HAIRS are not interfering with the youthful appearance that you have worked so hard to maintain through proper living.

If you have not seen them yet on yourself or your partner you will soon.

The study is also discussed in Discover Magazine as well:  NCBI ROFL: Science proves women who wax have better sex. | Discoblog | Discover Magazine.